Re: [IUG] Requesting off-site storage items (Leng-Ward, Graeme)

[Debbie Averhart <averhart at vt dot edu>]

We have an off-site storage building. Our request <hold level> is set 
to item. And we have a request rule that only allows the requesting 
of available items from storage. We only use the item paging slips. 
The items in our building are shelved by size, each item has a unique 
remote location. Since the paging list could not be customized to 
include the remote location, we had to write a retrieval list job 
that would serve as a pull list. Let me know if you would like to see the rule.


At 03:01 PM 1/28/2008, you wrote:
> Send INNOPAC mailing list submissions to
>         innopac at innopacusers dot org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         innopac-request at innopacusers dot org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         innopac-owner at innopacusers dot org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of INNOPAC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  Installing Expect at a turnkey site (Yitzchak Schaffer)
>    2.  System printer recommendations (Ginny Magisano)
>    3.  Bookmobile question (Ginny Magisano)
>    4.  Last Reminder IUG Beacon Award - Second Call for Nominations
>       (Deadline January 31, 2008) (Seeman, Corey)
>    5.   Mountain biking approved (D. Brooking)
>    6.  Requesting off-site storage items (Leng-Ward, Graeme)
>    7. Re:  Adding PIN authentication to My Account (Pacin, David)
>    8. Re:  Library mailers (Krimm, Debi)
>    9.  WAM - inconsistency (Andrew L. Pearson)
>   10.  Get rid of Need By Date in new ILL request - how?
>       (Fifarek, Aimee)
>   11.  QuestionRe:  IUG Bylaws amendments (Voting Soon) (Deb Bergeron)
>   12.  Licensing Electronic Resources Program (Robert H. Scheier)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:45:28 -0500
> From: Yitzchak Schaffer <yitzchas at touro dot edu>
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Installing Expect at a turnkey site
> To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID: <479D4FD8 dot 6060202 at touro dot edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Greetings --
>
> After a failed attempt at writing a suite of AutoIt scripts for
> Millennium to perform a specific function, I was delighted at how
> smoothly Expect works with the INNOPAC.  In Millennium, there were
> frequent illogical burps in the Java GUI that broke the script, whereas
> I have found Expect with telnet/ssh to be quite consistent.  The nature
> of telnet/ssh lends itself much more to scripting than the Java GUI -
> indeed, there's no straightforward way to "expect" a certain response
> from the app.  See Harvey Hahn's articles at
> http://www.ahml.info/oml/AutoIt.html for the gory details of his
> workarounds.
>
> My two cents from somewhat limited experience: do whatever you can
> outside the system via exports and PHP/Perl scripts (no risk to the
> primary data and you always have a handle on what's going on), use
> Expect for editing records directly where you need to, and only use
> AutoIt/Millennium when there's some Mil functionality that you
> absolutely need to work with.
>
> Yitzchak Schaffer
> Systems Librarian
> Touro College Libraries
> 33 West 23rd Street
> New York, NY 10010
> Tel (212) 463-0400 x230
> Fax (212) 627-3197
> yitzchas at touro dot edu
>
>
> Tom Baker wrote:
> > PS - How many of us are using AutoIT (like Expect, but for the graphical
> > interface)?  Does it do everything Expect will do?  More? Less?  Any
> > problems?
> >
> >
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:42:07 -0500
> From: Ginny Magisano <gmagisano at starklibrary dot org>
> Subject: [IUG] System printer recommendations
> To: "IUG (innopac at innopacusers dot org)" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <D67A7DB159F2BD489394F763E46BBFEF02EC38B6A1 at mail dot scdl dot local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> We are a new (consoritum) site and are looking for system printer 
> recommendations.  We currently are a Classic Dynix site that has 2 
> continuous-fed system printers.  One library uses an Okidata 590 to 
> print notices for their single site and Stark uses a Tally 2130n to 
> print notices for 19 sites.
>
> Our sales rep said III sells HP LaserJet 4250n, 4200n, 4100n and 
> 4050n printers.
>
> We would like to know what printers other libraries are using and 
> should we give up the continuous-fed printers and switch to laser 
> printers?  Are there consortiums that have sites using 
> continuous-fed printers and laser printers?  If so I'd be interested 
> in learning more about the setups.
>
> Any recommendations or comments you would like to share would be 
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks for helping out a newbie.
>
>
> Ginny Magisano
> ILS Coordinator
> Stark County District Library
> 715 Market Ave N.
> Canton, OH  44702-1018
> gmagisano at starklibrary dot org
> 330-458-3140 (phone)  330-452-0403 (fax)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:57:30 -0500
> From: Ginny Magisano <gmagisano at starklibrary dot org>
> Subject: [IUG] Bookmobile question
> To: "IUG (innopac at innopacusers dot org)" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <D67A7DB159F2BD489394F763E46BBFEF02EC38B6A2 at mail dot scdl dot local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> We will soon be going-live (Feb 26) and we would like to know how 
> libraries with bookmobiles handle renewing items for stops that have 
> been cancelled.
>
> In Dynix we have a process we can run that will automatically renew 
> the items until the next stop.  We understand this option is not 
> available in Millennium, as of yet, and wonder if there is a 
> work-around that collects items due on a specific date/stop and then 
> renew, or change the due dates, until the next time the bookmobile 
> visits the stop?
>
> Thanks for any help you would like to share.
>
>
> Ginny Magisano
> ILS Coordinator
> Stark County District Library
> 715 Market Ave N.
> Canton, OH  44702-1018
> gmagisano at starklibrary dot org
> 330-458-3140 (phone)  330-452-0403 (fax)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:41:11 -0500
> From: "Seeman, Corey" <cseeman at bus dot umich dot edu>
> Subject: [IUG] Last Reminder IUG Beacon Award - Second Call for
>         Nominations     (Deadline January 31, 2008)
> To: "IUG INNOPAC List" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Cc: "Seeman, Corey" <cseeman at bus dot umich dot edu>
> Message-ID:
>
> <287E6049816A424488EAB4435A964BF2039F6F01 at BUS-MAIL01 dot bus dot ads dot itcs dot umich dot edu>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello --
>
> This is the last reminder (I promise) about the call for nominations 
> for the 2008 IUG Beacon Award.  The nominations period closes on 
> Thursday January 31st.  This is a great way to recognize and 
> acknowledge your fellow IUG community members.
>
> Please make sure that you send nominations directly to me 
> (cseeman at umich dot edu) and not to the list as a whole.
>
> Thanks -- Corey
>
>
> --here is the original message--
>
> I am pleased to announce the call for nominations for the 2008 IUG 
> Beacon Award.  Please read the information below or follow the link 
> to the award page on the IUG site: 
> http://www.innovativeusers.org/awards/beacon.htm.
>
> Nominations should be sent to Corey Seeman (cseeman at umich dot edu) 
> following the instructions outlined below.
>
> IUG Beacon Award Information
>
> In 2007, the Innovative Users Group Steering Committee, at the 
> suggestion of many members, created the IUG Beacon Award. The 
> lighthouse was chosen as a symbol and the award was created to:
>
> "To honor exceptional service to the Innovative Users Community 
> through presentations, collaboration, selfless dedication to 
> libraries as a whole, and sage advice to others via the IUG List. 
> "While a great implementation is the product of a great employee, 
> the IUG Beacon Award will acknowledge great community members - 
> people who help others attain greatness and share the knowledge that 
> she/he gained in the process."
>
> The lighthouse was chosen to symbolize:
>
>     * Inspiration
>     * Navigation
>     * Illumination
>     * Protection
>
> Previous Winners of the IUG Beacon Award:
>
>     * 2002 (Houston)
>           o Mieko Yamaguchi - The University of Wales, Bangor
>     * 2007 (San Jose)
>           o Bob Duncan - Lafayette College
>     * 2008 (Washington, D.C.)
>           o TBD - Nominations due by January 31, 2008
>
> Nominating Process
>
> The IUG Past-Chairs and Steering Committee will solicit nominations 
> from the Innovative Community every fall. The past-chairs and 
> steering committee will select a recipient prior to the IUG Annual 
> Meeting, where the award will be presented.
>
> The current IUG Past-Chair will serve as the chair of the award 
> committee and will present the award at the annual IUG meeting.
>
> Nomination Process:
>
> * Nomination Calendar for 2008 IUG Beacon Award:
> --Call for Nominations - November 1, 2007
> --Deadline for Nominations - January 31, 2008
> --Presentation of Award - IUG Opening Session - Monday April 28, 2008
>
> * Nominations should be sent to the IUG Past Chair (Corey Seeman, 
> cseeman at umich dot edu) with the following information:
> --Name
> --Library Name
> --Why should this person earn the IUG Beacon Award?
> --Your Name & Library
>
> * Submission Notes:
> --You may submit the nomination directly in an email text, or send 
> it as an attached Word or PDF document.
> --Please keep the description to 100 words and highlight his or her 
> contribution to the IUG community through conferences, meetings, 
> services and assistance via the IUG list.
> --You may nominate yourself for this award.
>
> * Who is Eligible?
> --Any librarian or staff member at an IUG member library.
> --Current IUG Steering Committee members are ineligible. However, 
> regional officers can be nominated.
> --Previous winners of the award are ineligible. The award is 
> designed to honor long-term support of the Innovative community.
>
> * Number and Frequency of Awards:
> --IUG Awards Committee reserves the right to change the number of 
> award winners in any year.
> --The Awards Committee may opt to give the award to one or two 
> recipients during a single year.
> --The Awards Committee may also opt not to present the award at all 
> during a single year.
>
> * Selection Committee for IUG Beacon Award:
> --IUG Past-Chair serves as Chair of the Awards Committee
> --IUG Secretary/Treasurer
> --IUG Steering Committee Members-at-Large in their second year of office
> --Three most recent IUG Past-Chairs who are currently at an Innovative Library
>
> * Selection Committee for the 2008 IUG Beacon Award:
> --Corey Seeman (Kresge Business Library, University of Michigan), 
> IUG Past-Chair, Chair of the Awards Committee
> --Janet Crum (Oregon Health & Science University), IUG Secretary/Treasurer
> --Carol Gyger (Fort Collins (Col.) Public Library), IUG Steering 
> Committee Member-at-large
> --Leo Papa (Canton (Mich.) Public Library), IUG Steering Committee 
> Member-at-large
> --Cheryl Gowing (University of Miami), IUG Past-Chair
> --Karen Johnson (University of San Francisco), IUG Past-Chair
> --Anne Myers (Yale Law Library), IUG Past-Chair
>
> --end--
>
> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
>
> Best -- Corey
>
>
> Corey Seeman
>
> Director
> Kresge Business Administration Library
> Stephen M. Ross School of Business
> University of Michigan
> 701 Tappan Street, K3330
> Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
> (734) 764-9969
> Cell Phone (734) 717-9734
> Fax (734) 764-3839
> cseeman at umich dot edu
>
> http://www.bus.umich.edu/kresgelibrary/
> http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cseeman/index.html
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:35:44 -0800 (PST)
> From: "D. Brooking" <dbrookin at u dot washington dot edu>
> Subject: [IUG]  Mountain biking approved
> To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
> Message-ID:
>         <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 0801280929150 dot 8873 at homer23 dot u dot washington dot edu>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>
> An update:
>
> Please see the Subject Headings Weekly List for Jan. 9, 2008:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/cgi-bin/gourl?URL=%2Fcatdir%2Fcpso%2Fwls08%2Fawls0802.html
>
> The change from All terrain cycling and All terrain bicycles to Mountain
> biking and Mountain bikes has been approved.
>
> It took *much* less time than I anticipated. LCSH can be changed. See
> below for how to do it.
>
> ************Original Dec. message below:
>
> There is a way libraries can propose updates and new terms to LCSH. It is
> the SACO program. Please see:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/saco/saco.html
>
> (SACO covers both LCSH and LC Classification. Libraries can apply to be a
> "member" which I think takes a commitment of doing 10-12 proposals per
> year.)
>
> We (UW) will go ahead and make a change request to change "All terrain
> cycling" to "Mountain biking" based on the overwhelming literary warrant
> for the latter term.
>
> Change proposals have to come from the grass roots. Go for it.
> Consider joining SACO, or find a library that is aleady in it that is
> willing to help. Controlled vocabularies must be maintained in order to
> remain useful and ultimately tagging individual bib records is not a
> scalable solution.
>
> ************
> Diana Brooking             (206) 685-0389
> Cataloging Librarian       (206) 685-8782 fax
> Suzzallo Library           dbrookin at u dot washington dot edu
> University of Washington
> Box 352900
> Seattle WA  98195-2900
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Wynn, Stephen wrote:
> >
> >> I spoke last week about III's next-generation interface Encore, with
> an
> >> III rep who told me that whenever they do a demo, the catalogers
> present
> >> get very excited about the idea of adding tags in Encore.  "They
> just
> >> can't wait to add 'mountain biking' to all of those records that
> have
> >> 'All-terrain cycling,'" the rep said.  In previous demos I had
> gotten
> >> the idea that tagging was a feature for the user, but this rep
> >> specifically said that catalogers like the feature.
> >>
> >> (For those who haven't seen a demo, this last refers to III's claim
> that
> >> users can't find books about mountain biking because the LCSH is
> >> "All-terrain cycling."  I've heard this example from three different
> >> reps so it must be a house standard.)
> >>
> >> As a cataloger I find this response baffling.  The thought of
> creating
> >> and maintaining a nonstandard vocabulary ... well, it doesn't
> exactly
> >> fill me with joyful anticipation.
> >>
> >> But I must be missing something.  For those catalogers who anxiously
> >> await the opportunity to tag your records in Encore (or who already
> do
> >> so),
> >>
> >> What sorts of tags do you add?
> >>
> >> Why do you prefer an Encore tag to an uncontrolled MARC tag?
> >>
> >> Since "Mountain biking" is a SEE reference in the authority record
> for
> >> "All-terrain cycling," why do you need to add it as an Encore tag?
> >>
> >> Do you plan to review all of your authority records for SEE
> references
> >> that could be usefully added as Encore tags?
> >>
> >> Have you considered any automated methods of adding SEE references
> as
> >> Encore tags, in order to avoid the tedious and redundant manual work
> >> that Encore reps advocate?
> >>
> >> Stephen Wynn
> >> Head of Technical Services and Systems
> >> Pickler Memorial Library
> >> Truman State University
> >> Kirksville, MO 63501
> >> (660) 785-4535
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
> INNOPAC
> > list
> >> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> >> Update your subscription options:
> > http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> >>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options: 
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:46:02 -0000
> From: "Leng-Ward, Graeme" <G dot Leng-Ward at warwick dot ac dot uk>
> Subject: [IUG] Requesting off-site storage items
> To: <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <A55DC481CCB84F4EAB96F473B49178F9785846 at ELDER dot ads dot warwick dot ac dot uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
>
> Does anyone, not allowing available material to be requested
> (denyifavail), manage to use the Request functionality for requesting
> off-site storage material?
>
> We currently offer a non Millennium static web form for requesting
> off-site storage items. This form is not prepopulated with data from the
> bibliographic record, so it is clumsy for the patron to juggle two
> windows and retype or cut and paste the relevant data from the bib
> record to the request form.
>
> So far we have not considered using the request functionality for this
> purpose because the off-site material has an 'available' status, and we
> only allow requests where items are 'not available'.
>
> Alternatively has anyone prepopulated a non-millennium request form with
> data from the bib record?
>
> Cheers,
> Graeme
>
> Graeme Leng-Ward
> Metadata Services
> University of Warwick Library
> Coventry, UK.
> Email: g dot leng-ward at warwick dot ac dot uk
> Tel: 02476528138
> Our cat: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:01:17 -0600
> From: "Pacin, David" <PacinD at mls dot lib dot il dot us>
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Adding PIN authentication to My Account
> To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <79D9B8B01F402B4E94FB0D5E1EA4552AAFC441AD at BRMS1 dot LAN dot SLS dot LIB dot IL dot US>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We are also a site that has always used PINs.  Several years ago we 
> wanted to test NOT using PINs, and iii was able to set up another 
> port for that purpose; it wasn't something we could do 
> ourselves.  Also that was before WebPac Pro and ecommerce, both of 
> which might complicate things.  I'm sure iii could give you a more 
> definitive answer on that.
>
> -David Pacin
>   Metropolitan Library System
>   Burr Ridge IL 60527
>   630-734-5151
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Levin, Fran [mailto:flevin at rogersark dot org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:33 PM
> To: IUG INNOPAC List
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Adding PIN authentication to My Account
>
> We have always used PINs. We use last name, barcode and PIN. The patron
> can set their own PIN if they do not already have one. They just fill in
> the blanks, and when the computer sees that there is no PIN, a new
> screen is returned and they have to enter the PIN twice (like setting
> any password)and then it is in their record. It is an all or nothing
> switch. I do not believe you can test in staging first. Yes, patrons who
> seldom use their PINs forget them, but they are easily reset. The staff
> can do it, or the staff can delete the field and the patron can start
> all over.
>
> Most of the time when a patron calls and says they cannot access their
> account, it is not the PIN that caused the problem. The library card has
> expired or there is a block on their account for non-returned materials
> or late fees over the amount which we have set.
>
> Fran
> Fran Levin,
> Rogers Public Library
> 711 S. Dixieland Rd
> Rogers, AR 72758
> (479) 621-1152
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janice Painter [mailto:JPainter at princetonlibrary dot org]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
> Subject: [IUG] Adding PIN authentication to My Account
>
> Hello,
> We're looking for some feedback from libraries who have added PINs to
> the WebOPAC. Currently we use the last name and barcode to authenticate.
> We are looking to change to a name, barcode, PIN combination.
> Is there a way to test this on the staging port before we switch the
> live port's authentication?
> What have your experiences been with lost or forgotten pins?
>
> Is there staff intervention required to reset pins, and if so, what have
> been your experiences? What procedures do you have in place if someone
> calls or emails because they are unable to get onto their account
> because of a PIN mismatch?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Janice Painter
> Manager, Access Services
> Princeton Public Library
> 65 Witherspoon St.
> Princeton, NJ  08542
>
> email: jpainter at princetonlibrary dot org
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
> options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> "The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is 
> intended only for the named
> recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
> copy, distribute or take any
> action or reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
> please notify the sender. Any
> unauthorized disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail 
> is strictly prohibited."
> The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are the sender's own 
> and do not necessarily
> represent the views and opinions of the City of Rogers.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:26:18 -0800
> From: "Krimm, Debi" <DKrimm at aclibrary dot org>
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Library mailers
> To: "IUG INNOPAC List" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <B5B11B26733B3A4E9F67AF092F4CAA85028FD56C at LETTERMAN dot ACLIBRARY dot ORG>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
>
> We use a crash mailer that is only two part and we get them from Moore
> Business Forms.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
> [mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Rossi, Steve
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:08 AM
> To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
> Subject: [IUG] Library mailers
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are in the process of migrating from Sirsi/Dynix and we are currently
> using the 3-part library crash mailer to run overdue notices.
>
>
>
> We would like to continue to use the same mailers in Innovative. I was
> wondering if other libraries are using the 3-part library crash mailer,
> and was hoping someone could suggest a supplier.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Steve Rossi
>
> Rolling Meadows Library
>
> Rolling Meadows, IL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:15:11 -0500
> From: "Andrew L. Pearson" <apearson at bridgewater dot edu>
> Subject: [IUG] WAM - inconsistency
> To: "'innopac at innopacusers dot org'" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <A5DFAD8327D9E44DBE2DBAF6C181C03C71220C84 at bcex01 dot Bridgewater dot local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We're making progress. My thanks to everyone who's helped on this.
>
> I appear to have a continuity issue. I've developed my list of 
> links: http://www.bridgewater.edu/test/RemoteAccess.htm
>
> When testing them from home, I get different results each time I 
> try. Friday night, they all worked except Columbia International 
> Affairs Online (CIAO), then I tried again Sunday evening, Netlibrary 
> and Newsbank were not working. This morning, most of them weren't 
> working at all.
>
> I receive two kinds of errors.
> The first is not being able to locate the server.
> The second error brings up a search page saying
> -- Sorry. "0-www.oxfordreference.com.alex.bridgewater.edu" does not 
> exist or is not available!
>
> Any thoughts on the issue for this inconsistency?
>
> Andrew
>
> Andrew L. Pearson, M.L., M.A.
> Director of the Library
> Bridgewater College
> 402 East College Street
> Bridgewater, VA 22812
>
> Office:  (540) 828-5410
> Fax:       (540) 828-5482
> Email: apearson at bridgewater dot edu
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:20:25 -0700
> From: "Fifarek, Aimee" <afifarek at scottsdaleaz dot gov>
> Subject: [IUG] Get rid of Need By Date in new ILL request - how?
> To: "IUG INNOPAC List" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID:
>         <664A85D2D2CC3F419F3B15B89BE7CE34ABE013 at hpmsca01 dot ci dot scottsdale dot az dot us>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
>
> This seems like such a dumb question but are there templates for new ILL
> requests like there are for new records?  If so, how do you edit them?
> We want to do away with the need by date on our ILL request but I can't,
> for the life of me, figure out how to do it for the staff client.  We've
> removed the field from our OPAC screens and would like to do the same
> for our staff-submitted requests.  Can anyone point me in the right
> direction? -- Aimee
>
> Aimee Fifarek
> Library Technology Supervisor
> Scottsdale Public Library System
> 3839 N. Drinkwater Blvd.
> Scottsdale, AZ 85251
> 480-312-7060
> 480-312-7993
> afifarek at scottsdaleaz dot gov
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:44:27 -0600
> From: Deb Bergeron <bergeron at macalester dot edu>
> Subject: [IUG] QuestionRe:  IUG Bylaws amendments (Voting Soon)
> To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Message-ID: <479E309B dot 60607 at macalester dot edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Corey,
> These ByLaw changes are only for the IUG Steering Committee and NOT for
> Regional/local IUG Committees--is this correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deb
>
> Seeman, Corey wrote:
> > Hello -
> >
> > The IUG Site coordinators were notified yesterday about an 
> upcoming election for bylaws amendments.  Here is the text of the message.
> >
> > --message--
> >
> > On behalf of the IUG Steering Committee, I am writing to inform 
> you about an upcoming vote to amend the IUG bylaws.  These changes 
> were approved by the IUG Steering Committee at our meeting at ALA 
> Midwinter in Philadelphia this month.
> >
> > The changes in the bylaws are noted in brackets "[]" below:
> >
> > Proposed Bylaws change #1: Should a fifth 'member at large' be 
> added to the IUG Steering Committee?
> >
> > ARTICLE V. IUG STEERING COMMITTEE
> > Section 1.  The IUG Steering Committee shall consist of the 
> executive officers of the organization and five [previously four] 
> members of the organization elected at large to represent a broad 
> spectrum of the user population.  Steering Committee meetings are 
> open to all interested parties.
> >
> > Reason for the amendment: We are seeking a fifth member-at-large 
> position for the Steering Committee to assist in the management of 
> an organization that continues to grow and expand in services 
> offered.  Our desire is to have a Steering Committee member serve 
> as a liaison to the regional groups.
> >
> >
> > Proposed Bylaws change #2: If a fifth 'member at large' steering 
> committee is added, should we elect three member at large members 
> in even years?
> >
> > ARTICLE V. IUG STEERING COMMITTEE
> > Section 3.  Terms of Office for Members-at-Large The membership 
> shall elect five [previously four] IUG members to serve on the IUG 
> Steering Committee for a two-year term.  To provide for continuity, 
> two members-at-large would be elected in odd years and three 
> members-at-large would be elected in even years [this section 
> reflects the new voting pattern].
> >
> > Reason for the amendment: Since we are proposing to change the 
> number of members-at-large, we need change the way in which they 
> are elected.  With this structure, four new steering committee 
> members will be elected each year.  Also, the third member at large 
> will be elected in years with no secretary treasurer election.
> >
> >
> > Proposed Bylaws change #3: Should the proposed provision in the 
> case of a tie be adopted?
> >
> > ARTICLE VIII.  NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS
> > Section 2.  Elections
> > d. All candidates will be elected by majority vote.  In the event 
> of a tie, the winner will be determined by a coin toss, to be 
> mediated by the IUG Past-Chair immediately following the election 
> [the second sentence is new].
> >
> > Reason for the amendment: In reviewing the bylaws, we discovered 
> that we had no provision for a tie vote.  We have not had a tie in 
> recent elections, but we had some that were very close.  This will 
> provide a process should a tie occur after the voting.
> >
> > If you have any questions, please direct them to me.  Please look 
> for the voting to open on Monday January 28, 2008.  Voting will end 
> on February 13, 2008.  This will allow us, if approved, to modify 
> our call for Steering Committee nominees and elections for new 
> Steering Committee members.
> >
> > --end--
> >
> > We are voting on these bylaw changes first, and then will open up 
> a call for nominations for people to run for Steering 
> Committee.  We need to know how many positions will be open as we 
> invite candidates.  I will send more information in the coming weeks.
> >
> > If you have any questions about these bylaws amendments OR 
> running for Steering Committee, please do not hesitate to contact 
> me at cseeman at umich dot edu dot   Serving on the IUG Steering Committee has 
> been a tremendous experience and I hope you will consider it.
> >
> > Best --
> >
> > Corey Seeman
> > IUG Past Chair, 2007-2008
> > cseeman at umich dot edu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group 
> INNOPAC list
> > Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> > Update your subscription options: 
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> >
>
> --
>
> Deb Bergeron <mailto:bergeron at macalester dot edu> System Admin: User Support
> CLIC Consortium <http://clic.edu>
> 1619 Dayton Avenue, Suite 204A
> Saint Paul, MN 55104
> O:*651.644.3878* C:*651.487.7609* F:651.644.6258
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:47:41 -0500
> From: "Robert H. Scheier" <rscheier at holycross dot edu>
> Subject: [IUG] Licensing Electronic Resources Program
> To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>,        "listserv, WebBridge
>         user" <webbridge at listserv dot iii dot com>
> Message-ID: <479E315D dot 3000100 at holycross dot edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
>
> Please share this announcement with your colleagues. We are having
> trouble filling seats for this ACRL/NEC program at Dartmouth College in
> New Hampshire. The Holy Cross site is just about full.
>
> Thanks,
>
> =========================
> Bob Scheier
> Electronic Resources Librarian
> Dinand Library
> College of the Holy Cross
> 1 College Street
> Worcester, Mass. 01610-2395
> 508-793-3495
> rscheier at holycross dot edu
> =========================
>
>
> Licensing Electronic Resources Program
>
> Date:  3/4/08
>
> Location: Dartmouth College (New Hampshire)
>
> Time: 8:30-5:30 with break at 4:30 for those who need to leave early,
> lunch included
>
> Cost:
> $65 members of any sponsoring Library Association.
> $85 for non-members.
> $40 for Library School students.
>
> 8 Medical Library Association (MLA) credits included.
>
> Instructors: Laurie Thompson, Director; UT Southwestern Medical
> Library(Dallas, TX) and Harry Youtt, Attorney; Los Angeles, CA
>
> In the good old days, all we had to master was the Copyright Law and
> Fair Use. We would acquire a book or a journal, post and monitor a
> "fair-use" photocopy policy, and go on about our activities. Now,
> instead of receiving print materials, we become connected with online
> resources. With each new digital information product, there arrives a
> separate license. Each contains its own private "copyright" terms
> imposed by contract. This course provides an introduction to license
> provisions and terminology, comparing the license and copyright, and
> managing the licensing process. Through lecture, instructor debate and
> student participation, you will learn strategies for developing a
> license management model, including building a team for license
> evaluations and negotiation; conduct a clause-by-clause analysis of an
> existing license agreement; develop negotiating strategies; and discuss
> techniques for building a productive relationship with the legal department.
>
> To Register go to: http://www.holycross.edu/departments/library/erm/ler/
>
> Sponsors:
>
> NAHSL
> NETSL
> NE ASIST
> MAHSLIN
> ACRL NEC ITIG SIG
> ACRL NEC CE Committee
> ACRL NEC Serials SIG
> Dartmouth College
> College of the Holy Cross
> Serials Solutions
> Innovative Interfaces Inc.
>
> =========================
> Bob Scheier
> Electronic Resources Librarian
> Dinand Library
> College of the Holy Cross
> 1 College Street Worcester, Mass. 01610-2395
> 508-793-3495
> rscheier at holycross dot edu
> =========================
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC digest
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options: 
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
> End of INNOPAC Digest, Vol 49, Issue 49
> ***************************************

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Debbie Averhart
Va Tech
University Libraries