Re: Stats.derived from SCAT table

[Judy Ganson <ganson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I had the same problem with our tables and part of the problem turned out
to be circ-on-the-fly records for our old textbook collection with a local
numbering scheme entered in the LC call number field.  As those records
were deleted the number of "Call# not in table" declined.  We are still
finding and eliminating these records.

At 04:15 PM 2/9/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Hope you all can help me figure out a work-around/solution for a problem I
>encountered while running statistics based on call numbers (run off a SCAT
>table).  At the bottom of the statistics report there is the group "Call #
>not in table".  If I did the SCAT table correctly, there shouldn't be any
>in that grouping for the subset of our collection on which I ran the
>report. I've checked the table over 3 times and cannot -find- an error.
>
>Does anyone know of a way to see the records with "Call # not in
>table" so I can try to figure out where the error is in the SCAT table.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Nancy Birkrem
>Coordinator, Cataloging Unit
>Mount Holyoke College
>So. Hadley, Mass.
>
>
>